The debate format provides an opportunity for voters to get a full perspective on candidate positions and plans on a range of issues. This perspective is often inaccessible through other media, and debates offer a unique forum for candidates to engage with voters as equals. They can be more educational and informative than a single campaign event, a Sunday show interview, or a magazine article.
The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) currently allows candidates to participate in debates only if they meet two criteria: 1) a threshold of polling support and 2) electoral viability. These criteria are designed to ensure that participating candidates have a realistic chance of winning in the general election. However, the Working Group heard strong arguments from some advocates that these standards should be revised.
Among other things, the CPD could consider allowing debates with independent/non-aligned candidates that have already passed the ballot test in states that make up at least 270 electoral votes and have demonstrated that they can compete with the parties’ candidates by reaching a minimum threshold of 15% in national surveys. It also could extend debate invitations to a broader array of candidates, including those with an electoral lead but not yet meeting the 15% requirement, so that they can build their momentum and become more competitive.
Similarly, the CPD might consider changing its moderator selection process to allow more journalists with extensive experience in live television broadcast news to serve as moderators. This would help broaden the pool of potential moderators and reduce the risk that questions are biased or designed to advance political agendas.
About the Author
